<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The God Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/</link>
	<description>Tips and Lessons on the Science of Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-42027</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-42027</guid>
		<description>question everything you read. that includes this article and the bible.

just saying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question everything you read. that includes this article and the bible.</p>
<p>just saying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle`</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-13698</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-13698</guid>
		<description>Okay, well some problems here. First of all there is not an infinity of stars or galaxies, just a whole lot. In fact, there are more neurons in the brain of humans than stars in the entire Milky Way. Secondly, there is no such thing as evolution. I believe in natural selection and indeed the whole Galapagos Finch study was truly a result of natural selection. Natural selection makes perfect sense. If one animal is more capable of surviving, it will survive. I mean, look at us, we a harvesters for the most part and we flourish. Now, back to evolution and natural selection. Natural selection doesn&#039;t result in evolution and indeed evolution has never been shown, only again theorized. In fact, good ole Darwin was actually heavily involved in the Church until he came upon a book on Geology. So the finches did not evolve, they were naturally selected because those with bigger beaks could eat the seeds that those with smaller beaks couldn&#039;t open. This all happened as a result of a drought. But guess what happened after the drought ended and the rains came...the finch population returned to normal and the smaller beaked finches flourished cause there were more easy-to-open seeds available. Considering that these finches were the main reason for Darwin doing his evolution thing, we should be skeptical at the least. Not to mention that the whole title of Darwin&#039;s book was originally: &quot;On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.&quot; Don&#039;t believe me, wiki it. 
So, there is no place for evolution cause the Earth was created to nurture life and the life on it was created with infinite wisdom. 
Basically there is no need for science to burden itself with puny little attempts to control and organize the universe because God could flip it and reverse it before I finish this sentence. Although I must admit, what I have read was interesting.
Again, interesting, but that is all. People should read this and others for its entertainment value, that is all. The only guidebook for the Universe is free to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, well some problems here. First of all there is not an infinity of stars or galaxies, just a whole lot. In fact, there are more neurons in the brain of humans than stars in the entire Milky Way. Secondly, there is no such thing as evolution. I believe in natural selection and indeed the whole Galapagos Finch study was truly a result of natural selection. Natural selection makes perfect sense. If one animal is more capable of surviving, it will survive. I mean, look at us, we a harvesters for the most part and we flourish. Now, back to evolution and natural selection. Natural selection doesn&#8217;t result in evolution and indeed evolution has never been shown, only again theorized. In fact, good ole Darwin was actually heavily involved in the Church until he came upon a book on Geology. So the finches did not evolve, they were naturally selected because those with bigger beaks could eat the seeds that those with smaller beaks couldn&#8217;t open. This all happened as a result of a drought. But guess what happened after the drought ended and the rains came&#8230;the finch population returned to normal and the smaller beaked finches flourished cause there were more easy-to-open seeds available. Considering that these finches were the main reason for Darwin doing his evolution thing, we should be skeptical at the least. Not to mention that the whole title of Darwin&#8217;s book was originally: &#8220;On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.&#8221; Don&#8217;t believe me, wiki it.<br />
So, there is no place for evolution cause the Earth was created to nurture life and the life on it was created with infinite wisdom.<br />
Basically there is no need for science to burden itself with puny little attempts to control and organize the universe because God could flip it and reverse it before I finish this sentence. Although I must admit, what I have read was interesting.<br />
Again, interesting, but that is all. People should read this and others for its entertainment value, that is all. The only guidebook for the Universe is free to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>Excuse me...your statement is very wrong.

&quot;But keep in mind that Jesus said that all things in the BIBLE (even Genesis) are to be taken litteraly. Therefore, itâ€™s the word of scientists againsts the word of Jesus, the only begotten son, God Incarnate.&quot;

The bible was written way AFTER Jesus died. 

And it contains too many inconsistencies to be taken literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me&#8230;your statement is very wrong.</p>
<p>&#8220;But keep in mind that Jesus said that all things in the BIBLE (even Genesis) are to be taken litteraly. Therefore, itâ€™s the word of scientists againsts the word of Jesus, the only begotten son, God Incarnate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bible was written way AFTER Jesus died. </p>
<p>And it contains too many inconsistencies to be taken literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12727</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12727</guid>
		<description>There is no proof of the bing bang or evolution.  Nor is there any hard proof that the BIBLE is correct.  But there is more proof for these two theories than there is for any other religions theories.  So, from what I gather it&#039;s basically just a battle to see which view is correct-the BIBLE or the big bang.  But keep in mind that Jesus said that all things in the BIBLE (even Genesis) are to be taken litteraly.  Therefore, it&#039;s the word of scientists againsts the word of Jesus, the only begotten son, God Incarnate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no proof of the bing bang or evolution.  Nor is there any hard proof that the BIBLE is correct.  But there is more proof for these two theories than there is for any other religions theories.  So, from what I gather it&#8217;s basically just a battle to see which view is correct-the BIBLE or the big bang.  But keep in mind that Jesus said that all things in the BIBLE (even Genesis) are to be taken litteraly.  Therefore, it&#8217;s the word of scientists againsts the word of Jesus, the only begotten son, God Incarnate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: endless</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12479</link>
		<dc:creator>endless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12479</guid>
		<description>i believe that behind this deep sky, somewhere, far away, there are many planets  similar to ours.
we all know that there are an infinity of suns...this surely means that there are an infinity of galaxies...so i guess is impossible that there isn&#039;t any planet situated at the ideal distance from one of those suns...so, I&#039;m quite sure there is life outside our solar system.
This theory with god is in someway manipulative...
this is my opinion :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that behind this deep sky, somewhere, far away, there are many planets  similar to ours.<br />
we all know that there are an infinity of suns&#8230;this surely means that there are an infinity of galaxies&#8230;so i guess is impossible that there isn&#8217;t any planet situated at the ideal distance from one of those suns&#8230;so, I&#8217;m quite sure there is life outside our solar system.<br />
This theory with god is in someway manipulative&#8230;<br />
this is my opinion <img src='http://mindhacks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emi</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12473</link>
		<dc:creator>Emi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12473</guid>
		<description>These are timeless questions that people have debated for so long. I think what most want is concrete proof of what is really going on. Scientists by definition study only what can be observed. They test their theories. If they didn&#039;t do that then we would not be as advanced in many areas as we are. Science has broken through a lot of the power of religion to control peoples&#039; minds. In many ways we owe a lot of our freedom today to the development of science. Just study Leonardo DaVinci&#039;s life to realize how lucky we are to be living in a time where most people are not controlled by religious domination.
And yet there is something missing in all that science has done for humanity. It&#039;s missed the boat on the things that are intangible. There are things that are not observable that many experience and know are real. There is no accounting for the coincidences and experiences of many. People who believe in a creator are made fun of and put down because it is not observable. As I see it science is now becoming more responsive to these intangible experiences and beginning to study them. 
They are discovering new things about how our brains work and quantum physics. Will we ever find out just exactly how we came to be? Who knows. Perhaps if we do then we will truly be able to harness the great power and energy of an intelligent creator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are timeless questions that people have debated for so long. I think what most want is concrete proof of what is really going on. Scientists by definition study only what can be observed. They test their theories. If they didn&#8217;t do that then we would not be as advanced in many areas as we are. Science has broken through a lot of the power of religion to control peoples&#8217; minds. In many ways we owe a lot of our freedom today to the development of science. Just study Leonardo DaVinci&#8217;s life to realize how lucky we are to be living in a time where most people are not controlled by religious domination.<br />
And yet there is something missing in all that science has done for humanity. It&#8217;s missed the boat on the things that are intangible. There are things that are not observable that many experience and know are real. There is no accounting for the coincidences and experiences of many. People who believe in a creator are made fun of and put down because it is not observable. As I see it science is now becoming more responsive to these intangible experiences and beginning to study them.<br />
They are discovering new things about how our brains work and quantum physics. Will we ever find out just exactly how we came to be? Who knows. Perhaps if we do then we will truly be able to harness the great power and energy of an intelligent creator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Matfin</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12461</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Matfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12461</guid>
		<description>I aked for the free lessons to my home computer so I could see if your  material was any different to my own NLP training.  I found that it is much the same as other training I have received and reading I have done.  Very nicely done, very nicely presented.  However, I did not subscribe to receive these  materials at the University where I work.  So I was rather annoyed to find that the emails are being sent to my University webmail address also.  I will unsubscribe for this reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I aked for the free lessons to my home computer so I could see if your  material was any different to my own NLP training.  I found that it is much the same as other training I have received and reading I have done.  Very nicely done, very nicely presented.  However, I did not subscribe to receive these  materials at the University where I work.  So I was rather annoyed to find that the emails are being sent to my University webmail address also.  I will unsubscribe for this reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Espen K. Antonsen</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12429</link>
		<dc:creator>Espen K. Antonsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12429</guid>
		<description>Interresting that it has become open about the GOD issue within scientific circles! Who is this GOD or creator? Is it RA. ODIN, ZEVS, JAHVE, ALLAH or ? The God or creator idea is only an open theory like any other and lets it open to not be officially unthinkable at least</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interresting that it has become open about the GOD issue within scientific circles! Who is this GOD or creator? Is it RA. ODIN, ZEVS, JAHVE, ALLAH or ? The God or creator idea is only an open theory like any other and lets it open to not be officially unthinkable at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Espen K. Antonsen</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12427</link>
		<dc:creator>Espen K. Antonsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12427</guid>
		<description>This has been in my thoughts for a long long time! I have even an idea about if GOD is the Universe itself? If God is the universe itself then it also fits to the writings in the Bible that says that he gave of him self to create the world and everything around it.Lets say that the very fact of size does not matter as a hypothesis is the theory behind this it means that we may be a small small detail inside Gods body whos wondering around in his heavenly lands in another Universe where we are not able to be! We may be just some disposable parts of the total atomic structure that the Universe also looks like inside Gods body! If we act like virsuses we may become disposable and will be transformed to a more simple general matter. This I view in regards to the biblical views of the prophesys of the end of the  world and the judgement! Who knows its just a theory!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been in my thoughts for a long long time! I have even an idea about if GOD is the Universe itself? If God is the universe itself then it also fits to the writings in the Bible that says that he gave of him self to create the world and everything around it.Lets say that the very fact of size does not matter as a hypothesis is the theory behind this it means that we may be a small small detail inside Gods body whos wondering around in his heavenly lands in another Universe where we are not able to be! We may be just some disposable parts of the total atomic structure that the Universe also looks like inside Gods body! If we act like virsuses we may become disposable and will be transformed to a more simple general matter. This I view in regards to the biblical views of the prophesys of the end of the  world and the judgement! Who knows its just a theory!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myron Marano</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.org/the-god-theory/132/comment-page-1/#comment-12346</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron Marano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindhacks.org/2007/01/16/the-god-theory/#comment-12346</guid>
		<description>Maby God clapped his (or her)hands to create the BIG BANG after loooong  thought about the ingredence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maby God clapped his (or her)hands to create the BIG BANG after loooong  thought about the ingredence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
